Some somber news to report: Today marks the one-year anniversary of the Doce Fire, which burned more than 6,700 acres of the Prescott National Forest, and the 12-year anniversary of the Rodeo-Chediski Fire, which consumed 468,638 acres in Eastern Arizona. This summer, please follow the Leave No Trace Principles and share them with others. Let’s protect our forests and wilderness areas from fire.
Tag Archives: Doce Fire
Two Somber Anniversaries: Doce and Rodeo-Chediski Fires
Filed under Et Cetera, Mother Nature, News
Q&A: Spokesperson for the U.S. Forest Service Talks Wildfires & Spending Cuts
Arizona is still mourning the June 30 loss of 19 “hotshot” firefighters in the Yarnell Hill Fire, and while it will be a while before we know exactly what happened, we do know that the fire spread very quickly — much like the other recent wildfire in the Prescott area. That blaze, the Doce Fire northwest of Prescott, is now almost fully contained, as is Yarnell Hill. But if previous fire seasons are any indication, these won’t be the only dangerous wildfires Arizona faces this year.
As detailed in a recent Associated Press story, reduced federal funding for “fuels reduction” programs, such as prescribed burns, could make wildfires more severe and difficult to fight. Before the Yarnell Hill Fire broke out, we spoke with Cathie Schmidlin, a Southwestern Region spokesperson for the U.S. Forest Service, to learn how budget cuts could affect Arizona this fire season.
If more money had been spent on prevention, might Arizona’s recent wildfires have been less severe, or easier to control?
When wildfires occur, a lot of factors come into play, including weather, fuels conditions and terrain, so it isn’t really possible to speculate about [specific wildfires]. What we do know is that we have many examples of places, including Arizona, where reducing hazardous fuels has helped moderate fire behavior, made fires easier to control and made it easier for firefighters to protect lives, homes, and communities.
In 2006, the Forest Service initiated a program to evaluate the effectiveness of prescribed fire and mechanical treatments designed to reduce the risk of wildfire. When a wildfire starts within, or burns into, a fuel-treatment area, an assessment is conducted to evaluate the resulting impacts on fire behavior and fire suppression actions. In 2011, the Forest Service made the effectiveness assessment mandatory whenever a wildfire impacts a previously treated area.
Results show that, of almost 1,200 cases in the database, 93 percent of the fuel treatments were effective in changing fire behavior or helping with control of the wildfire; 56 percent of these fuel treatments were effective in helping keep wildfires less than 10 acres; and 61 percent were effective in helping keep wildfires less than 20 acres.
Because our capacity to treat fuels with prescribed fire and mechanical treatments is not adequate to restore all national-forest lands in need, it is especially important that wildfire itself be used as a tool, where possible, to restore forests. Appropriate wildfire response can include a range of actions from aggressive suppression to confinement, point protection and monitoring.
Are there areas of Arizona that could benefit from more prevention funding?
An emphasis, for more than a decade, in Arizona has been to treat hazardous fuels to reduce the risk of unwanted fire on communities, livelihoods, municipal watersheds and infrastructure. Treatments are focused in areas where risk is high, risk can be effectively mitigated, and communities are committed to implementing changes to become more fire-adapted.
Areas of focus in Arizona include the Four Forest Restoration Initiative (Coconino, Kaibab, Tonto, and Apache-Sitgreaves national forests), White Mountain Stewardship (Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests) Rim Communities (Tonto National Forest), Flagstaff Watershed Restoration Plan (Coconino National Forest), and Prescott Basin (Prescott National Forest).
We’ve had two gigantic wildfires (Rodeo-Chediski and Wallow) in the last decade. If funding cuts continue, could we be looking at another Wallow Fire somewhere else in Arizona in the near future?
The Wallow Fire actually was less severe due to treatments. The fire became easier to control in several areas that had been treated near Alpine, enhancing firefighters’ ability to protect property there.
We really can’t speculate about the impact of any future funding reductions. Reducing hazardous fuels is key to reducing the risk of extreme wildfires, and we will continue to do our best with the funds we have available.
The role and importance of fire in Southwestern forests is well-documented. Fire history (footprint of fire) directly affects fire severity, and it serves as a metric in anticipating future fire severity.
—Noah Austin, Associate Editor
Filed under Eco Issues
History Repeating Itself With the Doce Fire
History is notorious for repeating itself. Eleven years ago yesterday, the Rodeo Fire started on the Fort Apache Reservation. Two days later, the Chediski Fire was reported. The two fires eventually merged, becoming the second-largest wildfire in Arizona history. The Wallow Fire, in 2011, surpassed Rodeo-Chediski when it burned more than 538,000 acres. Despite the devastation of those two human-caused fires, it seems not everyone was paying attention. The proof? Yesterday, on the anniversary of Rodeo-Chediski, the Doce Fire started 8 miles northwest of Prescott. According to officials, the cause was human. The fire has already consumed 7,000 acres of forest, and containment is at zero percent.
The Leave No Trace principles exist to help prevent fires like Doce from happening. Yet, as we learned just a few weeks ago, people either don’t care or don’t listen, which likely explains why more than 70 illegal campfires were discovered on the Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests over Memorial Day weekend.
So, here we go again. Homes have been evacuated, and the American Red Cross has already set up an evacuation center at Yavapai College. Let’s hope that this fire is contained soon.
By submitting photographs to Arizona Highways via Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Tumblr or other social networking sites, the photographer grants Arizona Highways electronic rights. No financial consideration will be paid to anyone for publication on the Arizona Highways blog or Website.
By publishing a photographer’s work to its blog, Arizona Highways does not endorse the photographer’s private business or claim responsibility for any business relationships entered into between the photographer and our readers.
Filed under Eco Issues, News