Advocates: Catalina Bighorn Sheep Project Is Working

February 2014

February 2014

In our February 2014 issue, Arizona Highways contributor Charles Bowden penned a beautiful essay about the recent reintroduction of desert bighorn sheep in the Santa Catalina Mountains. At the time, Bowden didn’t know how the animals would fare. Over the weekend, an op-ed written by three members of the Catalina Bighorn Advisory Committee was posted to the Arizona Daily Star’s website.

Catalina Bighorn Sheep Project Requires Patience But Moves in the Right Direction
By Randy Serraglio, Center for Biological Diversity; Mike Quigley, The Wilderness Society; and Brian Dolan, Arizona Desert Bighorn Sheep Society

It has now been more than a month since any reintroduced desert bighorn sheep have died in the Santa Catalina Mountains north of Tucson. Three mountain lions have been removed as a result of the Catalina Bighorn Restoration project, and this is unfortunate, but biologists say it will not affect the overall health of the area’s lion population. And wildlife managers have spotted five lambs, all of which appear to be healthy and growing.

This is good news for bighorn and everyone rooting for their recovery in a place they called home for thousands of years before they winked out in the 1990s.

The project has been criticized, largely for the lion removals, which are necessary to give the sheep a chance to become established. However, the project’s conservative, targeted lion management plan is designed to keep those removals to a minimum, and it’s been balanced by a closure of the reintroduction area to recreational lion hunting with hounds.

Sheep mortality has been high as individuals explore new terrain and learn escape routes, and that’s regrettable, but high mortality is common with reintroductions of all sorts of wildlife, including desert bighorn. Many past bighorn reintroductions in Arizona and elsewhere around the West started slowly, yet have achieved success. Encouragingly, most of the Catalinas sheep are now congregating in prime habitat: the extremely rugged terrain of the Pusch Ridge Wilderness.

Even using the best available science, wildlife management is a delicate and difficult task. The key is to adapt management decisions to ongoing data collection and changes in conditions on the ground as projects move forward, in order to give species the best chance for recovery. Some individuals may unavoidably be lost in the process, but the key is to increase the overall population of the species and the number of places where it can be found.

By the middle of the 20th century, bighorn sheep numbers had crashed in Arizona and all over the West, largely due to commercial harvest, disease and habitat loss. Since then they’ve made a dramatic recovery, for two main reasons.

First, states now regulate hunting of bighorn sheep in a rational, science-based fashion, greatly limiting the number of individuals taken every year so that herd populations remain stable and secure. Second, groups that support bighorn conservation put a lot of time, effort and money into reintroduction projects like the one now underway in the Catalinas. About 70 percent of those reintroductions have been successful, and Arizona bighorn numbers have rebounded from a low in the hundreds to nearly 6,000 sheep statewide.

However, just as it’s far too soon to call the Catalinas reintroduction a failure, it’s also too soon to pop the champagne cork. Later this year the Catalina Bighorn Advisory Committee will analyze all the data and experiences of the project’s first year and make a science-based recommendation on whether to continue with another translocation of sheep. Due to slow reproduction rates, it can take many years for a bighorn herd to become reestablished in numbers that are self-sustaining.

Challenges remain, and more sheep will be lost, but several factors point toward optimism: The Coronado National Forest and volunteers have spent hundreds of hours educating recreational users about the importance of staying on trails and not taking dogs into the bighorn reintroduction area. The Coronado is finalizing plans to return fire to its natural role in the Catalinas through its FireScape program, which will benefit habitat for bighorn and many other species. And this summer, workers will break ground on the Oracle Road project, which includes wildlife crossings that will allow sheep to connect with other herds. Bighorn are successfully using such crossings in northern Arizona and other places.

The stark reality of the modern world is that people affect wildlife every day. We believe that intervening to correct our mistakes, mitigate our negative influences, and give wildlife the chance to survive and recover is the right thing to do. We agree with Charles Bowden’s conclusion in a recent issue of Arizona Highways: “We can do better than we have. We can bring the bighorns back where they belong.”

3 Comments

Filed under Mother Nature, News

3 responses to “Advocates: Catalina Bighorn Sheep Project Is Working

  1. Why would anyone feel the urge to kill one in the first place. I just don’t get it.

  2. Sixteen of 30 adult sheep that were netted out of their familiar habitat near Yuma and dumped out into the foreign habitat in the Catalina Mtns are now dead. The lamb that made up the 31 total bighorn sheep that were relocated may also be dead. No one knows, because the lamb did not have a radio collar. Five lambs have been born, but there is no confirmation as to how many of those are still alive. Lamb mortality is 70% to 80% during the first year of life in familiar habitat. The impetus for the bighorn project in the Catalina Mtns is to establish a huntable herd. If desert bighorn sheep were not a shootable species, the project would not be happening. The classification of the quality of habitat in the Catalinas … there’s a map with grids … indicates that the vast majority of the habitat is only poor to fair for bighorn sheep. Why did the project proceed? Because a single species advocacy group, the Desert Bighorn Sheep Society, politially dominates the AZ Game & Fish Commission. Members of that Commission are also members of the Desert Bighorn Sheep Society. They have a bias in favor of the Catalina Project is far from being based on any “science”. Ask some of the more notable wildlife biologists like Dr. Linwood Smith and D.J. Schubert. Even retired AZ Game & Fish mountain lion expert, Harley Shaw, considers the project to be similar to raising trout in a fish hatchery for a put and take benefit for trout fishermen. The project should be discontinued, and the four enviromental groups that are trying to green wash the Project … the Center for Biological Diversity, The Wilderness Society, the Arizona Wilderness Coalition and the Sky Island Alliance, should withdraw from the Advisory Committee and stop being coopted and compromised by the Game & Fish Dept, the Desert Bighorn Sheep Society and the other participants. Furthermore, the Project is is direct violation of the Environmental Protection Act, because it involves Federal land (Coronado Nat’l Forest) and Federal funds, I think from Pitmann Robertson money. Those two factors require an environmental impact statement that considers alternatives to using helicopters in wilderness areas, to killing mountain lions in large numbers (there are way more than just three lions killed) and to netting sheep out of healthy herds over by Yuma. In a three year period in the Aravaipa Canyon area, 43 lions were killed at the instigation of the Desert Bighorn Sheep Society. In 2012 there were 22 lions killed in Unit 33, which includes the Catalinas and the Rincons. Removing this large number of apex predators has a negative influence on the whole ecosystem. The Catalina Bighorn Project is a far cry from “working”, and I suggest that those who think it is extract their heads from where the sun don’t shine and objectively examine the facts … the science that really applies, not just the political biases of the Desert Bighorn Sheep Society and that group’s lackeys on the Game & Fish Commission.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s